- About the project
- Researchers
- Contact
- Subproject: Concern and detachment in moral life
- Subproject: Pantheism and personhood in classical German philosophy
- Subproject: Law and virtue in the Protestant tradition
- Subproject: Spinoza, freedom of speech and the common good
- Subproject: Kierkegaard and transparency thinking
- Subproject: Theological perspectives on meaningful family life
- Subproject: Medical ethics at the end of life
- Subproject: The moral position of family in end of life care for people with dementia
- Subproject: The contribution of military chaplains to moral formation
- Subproject: Law, ethics and polarisation in the Bible and ancient Judaism
Subproject: Spinoza, freedom of speech and the common good
Ethics and politics
This project focuses on a classic defender of freedom of speech, Benedict de Spinoza (1632-1677). Spinoza's defense has often been associated with an individualistic form of liberalism. This project instead brings to light that Spinoza's thinking has a robust, theologically grounded view of the shared good, or common good. Freedom of speech is essential to the development of self-made laws, which in turn contribute to the people living under such laws becoming freer and more rational. In the Ethics, Spinoza presents free, rational life as the quest to understand ourselves, other people and God. Spinoza's politics can be said to be aimed at realizing something of this ideal of the Ethics on a collective scale.
Reasonable and free debate
Spinoza believes that in a free state, governed by a moderate government, there will be a lively public debate about laws, policy, science and religion. As long as citizens engage in this debate politely and reasonably, they should be free to express their opinions. A good sovereign listens carefully to their input, but always has the last word on legal and political decisions. However, Spinoza advocates democracy - or at least forms of government with substantial democratic elements - so that (groups of) citizens will also be involved in sovereign decision-making.
Religious freedom
In religious matters, Spinoza advocates tolerance and the freedom to love God in our own way - whether in a more traditional religious or philosophical way. He sees intolerant religious factions as a threat to freedom and political stability, which is why the sovereign must also have the last word in religious matters. In doing so, the sovereign must allow believers as much freedom as is compatible with peace and order.
Freedom and public interest
This subproject first analyses how Spinoza's concept of freedom of speech (and the related concept of libertas philosophandi, the freedom to philosophize) is connected to his view of the common good. Our focus is on Spinoza's concept of the proper exercise of free speech as a civic virtue crucial to sustaining free, thriving societies.
Second, it examines whether Spinoza's perspective is helpful in moving beyond the impasses in current public discourse. An important insight in this context is that Spinoza's concept of free speech is linked to a relational concept of autonomy. That is, by exercising our right to free speech, we exercise our autonomy, but we can only truly realize our individual autonomy when our fellow citizens also develop their autonomy. For Spinoza, the development of freedom, rationality and human flourishing are essentially collective endeavours. This emphasis on the collective dimension of freedom and free speech represent an alternative to the individualistic premises that underlie current liberal visions of good coexistence.